Clearly, if clusters are to be meaningful, the similarity measure should be invariant to transformations natural to the problem domain. Also, normalization may strongly affect clustering in a positive or negative way. The features have to be chosen carefully to be on comparable scales and similarity has to reflect the underlying semantics for the given task.
Euclidean similarity is translation invariant but scale sensitive while cosine is translation sensitive but scale invariant. The extended Jaccard has aspects of both properties as illustrated in figure 4.1. Isosimilarity lines at , 0.5 and 0.75 for points and are shown for Euclidean, cosine, and the extended Jaccard. For cosine similarity only the 4 (out of 12) lines that are in the positive quadrant are plotted: The two lines in the lower right part are one of two lines from at 0.5 and 0.75. The two lines in the upper left are for at and 0.75. The dashed line marks the locus of equal similarity to and which always passes through the origin for cosine and extended Jaccard similarity.
Using Euclidean similarity , isosimilarities are concentric hyperspheres around the considered point. Due to the finite range of similarity, the radius decreases hyperbolically as increases linearly. The radius does not depend on the centerpoint. The only location with similarity of 1 is the considered point itself and all finite locations have a similarity greater than 0. This last property tends to generate nonsparse similarity matrices. Using the cosine measure renders the isosimilarities to be hypercones all having their apex at the origin and axis aligned with the considered point. Locations with similarity 1 are on the 1dimensional subspace defined by this axis. The locus of points with similarity 0 is the hyperplane through the origin and perpendicular to this axis. For the extended Jaccard similarity , the isosimilarities are nonconcentric hyperspheres. The only location with similarity 1 is the point itself. The hypersphere radius increases with the the distance of the considered point from the origin so that longer vectors turn out to be more tolerant in terms of similarity than smaller vectors. Sphere radius also increases with similarity and as approaches 0 the radius becomes infinite rendering the sphere to the same hyperplane as obtained for cosine similarity. Thus, for , extended Jaccard behaves like the cosine measure, and for , it behaves like the Euclidean distance.


In traditional Euclidean means clustering the optimal cluster representative minimizes the sum of squared error criterion, i.e.,
(4.6) 
(4.7) 
To illustrate the values of the evaluation function are used to shade the background in figure 4.2. The maximum likelihood representative of and is marked with a in figure 4.2. For cosine similarity all points on the equisimilarity are optimal representatives. In a maximum likelihood interpretation, we constructed the distance similarity transformation such that . Consequently, we can use the dual interpretations of probabilities in similarity space and errors in distance space.